Quantcast
Last update: March 12 2010, 11:58 PM
LIFESTYLE ARTS AND BOOKS - LIFESTYLE ARTS AND BOOKS ARTS AND BOOKS
 

Chopin and Licad

March 08, 2010

IN 1992, WHEN I TRAVELLED with Cecile Licad for the first time in Cebu, she was heard by a Polish poet and music critic named Christopher Jezewski. He told Ms (Rosario) Licad he heard a Chopin concerto on radio in Paris and told himself, only a Filipina pianist could play that Chopin the way it was beautifully molded.

True enough, the announcer said it was the F Minor Concerto played by the London Philharmonic under Andre Previn with Licad as soloist.

On our second visit to Cebu, in 1994, Licad played Chopin’s Sonata No. 2 for her finale number. For several seconds after the last notes had ended, the audience remained unmoving. I myself had so absorbed the piece one thought it would break the trance if one applauded.

The Chopin B Flat Minor Sonata is also referred to as the Funeral March because of the third movement which is referred to as the most celebrated elegy in instrumental music. I froze after the last note as Licad’s interpretation was like confronting death itself, in a beautiful, if dignified, manner.

Later at the CCP, I heard Ms Marcos told Cecile: “After that Chopin sonata, I am not afraid to die anymore. Cecile, you are a sorcerer of an interpreter.”

About sorrow

The three-page finale of this sonata, which is about sorrow giving way to torment, was described by Schumann thus: “This great movement is perhaps the boldest page which has been written in the whole of music.”

Among those who raved over Licad’s B Flat Sonata was National Artist for Architecture Leandro V. Locsin, who passed away two months after that concert.

Speaking of the Polish poet-critic, he actually wrote to ask if Licad could do a recital for the Polish Institute in Paris to honor the great Polish pianist Mieczsyslaw Horszowski, who happened to be one of Licad’s teachers in Curtis.

In the same breath, he complained that it was hard to get Licad’s all-Chopin recording in France, where he found one through the Internet.

He wrote to Licad thus: “Your Chopin is absolutely marvelous, it’s like listening to him resuscitated! You should record as much as possible of his works! Please, you must do it for humanity! It’s so terribly rare to hear such an interpretation, absolutely adequate to the message of the music.”

Meanwhile, music-lovers all over the world share the Polish poet-critic’s frustrations in not being able to find Licad’s recordings. Her last Chopin recording contains Ballade for Piano No. 1 in G Minor, Op. 23; Nocturne for Piano No. 4 in F Major, Op. 15; 12 Etudes for Piano, Op. 1; and Scherzo for Piano No. 2 in B Flat Minor, Op. 31.

Said a music lover complaining to a record store by Internet: “I love this recording by Licad as much as I loved her Chopin Piano Concerto No. 2 recording almost 20 years ago. I agree with the first two reviewers that Licad’s recordings must be made more available. I also would love to see her making more recordings, but she seems to be very picky and does not make records as much as other contemporary classical artists today.”

Nothing like live concert

Still there is nothing like a live concert to judge Licad’s interpretation of Chopin.

When Licad first played Chopin’s 12 Etudes Op. 25, in Washington, D.C., some years back, the Washington Post critic paid tribute to Licad as a supreme interpreter of Chopin: “The complete Opus 5 set of etudes offered similar mix of lyricism (Nos. 1 and 2), muscularity (Nos. 10,11 and 12), and recreative spark (the gnarled and galumphing treatments of Nos. 4 and 5). Licad could certainly conjure Chopin’s perfumed-salon side, as in her delicate and simply stated Op. 57, Berceuse. Throughout the evening, Licad’s fierce intelligence illuminated the emotional core of Chopin.”

But nothing beats the erudite words of Philadelphia Inquirer critic Daniel Webster in his review of Licad in February last year, titled “Chopin Evokes Substance of Style.”

Wrote Webster: “We hear a different Chopin from what our elders heard. The music is more direct, edgy and muscular. The poetry is there, but the urgency of it is even more clear-eyed, more intense. The subtle differences have emerged as all the elements of life have changed around the music. Cecile Licad made that point in her recital Friday at the Philosophical Society. The pianist exemplifies the style. Her focus is the instrument. If Licad’s listeners want to join her, they are welcome, and on Friday were assured glimpses of passion that colored her highly objective playing. She skirted excessive freedoms in the Scherzo No. 1, and rattled some thunder in its landscape. The Scherzo No. 4, just before the Liszt closer, replaced thunder with grandeur and some delicacies that caught the solidity of her approach. Her playing carries the weight of authority and the absence of doubt. This is the way it is, that last scherzo proclaimed.”

Licad played Chopin No. 2 with Syracuse Symphony on Feb. 12-13, and earlier did a mostly Chopin concert in San Antonio, Texas, and an all-Chopin recital in Ohio consisting of the 24 preludes and four scherzos.

In the Texas audience were Filipino music-lovers, Dr. Omar Zantua, Ching Zantua-Allan and her son, Anthony, and Dr. Monette Regalado.

Said Ching Zantua: “The concert was spectacular and the pianist nearly ran out of encores. That was how well-received she was. It was an experience of a lifetime.”

©2010 www.inquirer.net all rights reserved

Send your feedback here

 
< Back